The following response to the question posed in the blog title comes from best-selling author, someone whose writing has taught me many lessons, Malcolm Gladwell. It was originally posted, years ago on ESPN.com. Here is the original version.
“The (short) answer is that it’s really risky to work hard, because then if you fail you can no longer say that you failed because you didn’t work hard. It’s a form of self-protection. I swear that’s why Mickelson has that almost absurdly calm demeanor. If he loses, he can always say: Well, I could have practiced more, and maybe next year I will and I’ll win then. When Tiger loses, what does he tell himself? He worked as hard as he possibly could. He prepared like no one else in the game and he still lost. That has to be devastating, and dealing with that kind of conclusion takes a very special and rare kind of resilience.
“Most of the psychological research on this is focused on why some kids don’t study for tests — which is a much more serious version of the same problem. If you get drunk the night before an exam instead of studying and you fail, then the problem is that you got drunk. If you do study and you fail, the problem is that you’re stupid — and stupid, for a student, is a death sentence.
“The point is that it is far more psychologically dangerous and difficult to prepare for a task than not to prepare. People think that Tiger is tougher than Mickelson because he works harder. Wrong: Tiger is tougher than Mickelson and because of that he works harder.”
I found this a real thought-starter for me as I approached different tasks during my ‘do-over’. I see how I fell into this trap in the past, and how it had held me back.
Does this resonate with you?
Follow me on Twitter at @RyanMobilia here or connect with me on LinkedIn here.